Compared to the Sony Rx100, the Canon G9x is a better camera.

They both provide excellent functionality, but if we had to choose a winner, we would have to go with the Sony RX 100 IV because to its better features and design. Its electronic viewfinder, longer battery life, selfie-friendly LCD screen, and greater video definition are just some of the features it offers. It’s the point-and-shoot camera that comes into play when you’re already an accomplished photographer but find your DSLR to be too large and unwieldy to take about.

Other comparisons concerning point-and-shoot cameras have led me to conclude that these cameras are more geared at those who aren’t very interested in photography, but who just want a camera to capture their memories. The scenario is different with these two cameras, which are both rather high-end in terms of functionality and performance, despite the fact that they are both quite inexpensive. Did this review assist you in making a choice on your camera purchase? If you’d like to see a different side-by-side camera evaluation, just use the search bar at the bottom of this page. Alternatively, you may click on any of the hyperlinks in the table below to see comparisons that others have found interesting.

The RX100 has received a score of 66, which is three points more than the G9 X, which is the other camera in this comparison. So, which of the two cameras, the Canon G9 or the Sony RX100, is the superior model? Both the Sony Cyber-shot DSC RX 100 IV and the Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II are outstanding and reasonably priced cameras in our opinion.

In particular, I like these kind of cameras since they are virtually simple to transport wherever you go, they are lighter than any other sort of camera available, and this particular model weighs just 209grams with the battery included. As for the buttons, I don’t believe we need go into too much detail about them since point-and-shoot cameras have a very basic function, which means they don’t have many buttons, just the essential ones. It manufactures tiny cameras with fixed lenses that are lightweight and portable, as well as innovative mirrorless cameras and cutting-edge DSLR cameras. Canon offers a camera for everyone, regardless of whether you have $100 or $5,000+ in your pocket.

The ability to wirelessly transmit photographs to other devices is a significant advantage. So far, I’ve only been able to upload them to my iPhone through the Canon Camera Connect App, however this connection was quite simple to set up and has proven to be reliable so far. I just wish I had chosen the slightly more expensive one that had wifi, so that I could have connected to my smartphone. There is a lot packed into this little camera, which can zoom in 30 times and capture fantastic photos with a variety of choices. I enjoy the way the touch screen is used, and I appreciate the many configuration possibilities.

The Sony RX100 offers a 16mm greater reach than the Canon G9 X II when it comes to telephoto lenses. At the telephoto end, both cameras have a maximum aperture of f4.90. The following is a comparison of the rear views of the Canon G9 X II with the Sony RX100. The front view size comparison of the Canon G9 X II and the Sony RX100 can be seen in the table below. In terms of width and thickness, the Canon G9 X II is 4mm narrower and 5mm thinner than the Canon G9 X II, although they both stand at 58mm in height. In this review, we’ll be comparing the Canon G9 X II and Sony RX100, two Large Sensor Compact cameras from the companies’ respective lineups.

All width, height, and depth measurements are given to the nearest millimeter unless otherwise stated. I came very near to purchasing one of the RX series cameras on more than one occasion, but the size was just too huge. I took the time to speak with business owners and dealt with them on a number of occasions. Although it seems unlikely, I was hoping that either Sony or Canon will release a comparable camera with a similar sensor, but in a bit more pocketable size… My favorite features are the size and the pricing, which are both quite reasonable.

Upon the release of the RX100, I’d estimate that one out of every three reviews remarked how much Sony had borrowed from the Canon design while increasing the sensor size. Unfortunately, the noise reduction provided by the RX100 was so poor that hair, trees, and grass were all reduced to “mush.” Similarly, the skin on faces was smoothed off much too much for most people’s liking, and highlights were sometimes blown out on photographs taken in bright sunlight – but the Purple Fringing was unacceptable. Also included is a built-in Wi-Fi network for fast sharing and transferring with compatible smartphone and tablet devices.

This function allows the camera to capture high-quality images in low light conditions. I am a writer, photographer, and filmmaker who also happens to be a camera enthusiast. I also like traveling and photographing landscapes in various locations across the world. The world is amazing, and I like documenting my travels and adventures via photography.

And, maybe unexpectedly, by quite a few pros as a backup camera, owing to the picture quality, which was very excellent for such a little camera at the time. DXO Mark has published information on sensor performance for a large number of cameras. Using this service, an overall sensor rating is determined, as well as sub-scores for low-light sensitivity (“DXO Sports”), dynamic range (“DXO Landscape”), and color depth (“DXO Portrait”) (“DXO Portrait”). Considering that the DXO scores for the two cameras under examination are almost identical, it seems that they provide equal image capabilities.

sony rx100